MILITARY● ELEVATEDSep 16 · Sep 16, 2026, 5:30 PM
Would NATO Membership for Ukraine Undermine Article 5 Itself?
War on the Rocks · eastern europe
In 2025, Jennifer Kavanaugh and Christopher McCallion wrote, “Armed Neutrality for Ukraine Is NATO’s Least Poor Option,” where they made the case for armed neutrality over full NATO membership as the wiser course for both Ukraine and NATO. A year later, we asked them to revisit their arguments. Image: MidjourneyIn your 2025 article, you argued that NATO membership and binding U.S. or European security guarantees for Ukraine were effectively unworkable, and that armed neutrality was the option best suited to protecting both Ukraine’s security and NATO’s credib
GlobeAlert aggregates and classifies open sources; the story above belongs to its publisher. Summaries are machine-generated from the source text.
More in Military
MILITARY13m agoEnsuring US military readiness in the face of water, power, and fuel shortagesAtlantic CouncilMILITARY13m agoDidn’t get picked for IFPC interceptor competition? Army says come demo anywayBreaking DefenseMILITARY46m agoFrance and Chad sign 'renewed' defence partnership following two-year hiatusRFI [en]MILITARY49m agoEuropean Commission allocates nearly €2.9 bln more to Ukraine for drones, air defense and missilesUkrinform [en]