GLOBEALERT
Sign in
The wire

Feed

Open sources, classified and cross-checked. 19,057+ stories.

AllConflictMilitaryPoliticsBusinessSci & TechCyberDisasterHealthWorld
24h3 days7 days30 daysAll·All regionsNorth AmericaSouth AmericaWestern EuropeEastern EuropeBalticsMiddle EastNorth AfricaSub-Saharan AfricaSouth AsiaEast AsiaOceania
WorldOct 112026 NASCAR Chase Odds: Kyle Larson Favored For CharlotteThe Chase heads to Charlotte for the Bank of America 400, and the race gets the green flag on Sunday, Oct. 11 at 12 p.m. ET. However, bettors might want to note…spotontennessee · united states of america
BusinessOct 11‘Other Mommy’ tops weekend box office with $27M, domestic ticket sales cross $8BThe film 'Other Mommy' topped the weekend box office with $27 million, contributing to domestic ticket sales surpassing $8 billion. This indicates strong performance in the entertainment sector.Seeking Alpha Tech
PoliticsOct 11GOP Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso calls reports about Kimberly Guilfoyle "very troubling"GOP Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso told "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" that "what we've seen in the reports is very troubling" about Kimberly Guilfoyle, the ambassador to Greece, allegedly asking Eric Deters to pay $100,000 of her debts to help her confirmation. "It's concerning and I'm sure there's going to be an investigation," he added.CBS News
PoliticsOct 11Trump’s Russian diesel deal may be illegal, says prominent Republican senatorRepublican US Senator Thom ⁠Tillis on Sunday said US President Donald ⁠Trump’s diesel supply deal with Russia may be ⁠illegal and will put American lives at risk, adding to bipartisan criticism of the arrangement announced by the president on Friday. Trump said Russia had agreed to supply diesel to global markets and his administration temporarily lifted US sanctions on Russian fuel that were designed to deprive Moscow of revenue for its war on ‌Ukraine. “I do believe there’s a legitimate case...South China Morning Post
PoliticsOct 11Sen. Chris Murphy says Trump administration is "absolutely incompetent in war making"Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" slammed the Trump administration for its handling of the Iran war, saying "if the Trump administration was trying to lose this war, they couldn't do worse than they are doing," adding he believes they are "absolutely incompetent in war making."CBS News
Sci & TechOct 11They drilled more than 4,400 meters underground in Utah and managed to pump water through rock at 400 degrees to a 33-megawatt power plantAn American company put into operation a geothermal power plant that produces energy. The project seeks to supply California with electricity 24 hours a day.Clarín
PoliticsOct 11Hamilton says Vance’s attacks on his religion are ‘really sad,’ ‘pathetic’Kansas Senate candidate Adam Hamilton (D) on Sunday clapped back at Vice President Vance’s attacks on his religious beliefs, calling the attacks “really sad” and “pathetic.” ABC’s Jonathan Karl sat down to interview Hamilton in the Sunflower State and asked the moderate pastor about Vance, who has been outspoken about his religious beliefs since before…The Hill
DisasterBreakingOct 115 killed, 3 injured, including 2 MPD officers after crash in Hickory Hill, MPD saysfox13memphis · united states of america
ConflictOct 11Russia’s Kaliningrad threat is aimed at the ally Washington left outside the roomAs approximately 1,000 U.S. soldiers prepare to return to Lithuania by late October, the Kremlin continues to probe NATO commitments through threats regarding the Kaliningrad exclave.The Hill
WorldOct 11University of Michigan scholars' textbook will help teach about Ukraine – professorA group of scholars and researchers have prepared a textbook that will be available in several languages and help educators teach about Ukraine in the context of the crimes Russia is committing during the war.Ukrinform [en]
PoliticsOct 11Mullin says livestreaming Hasan execution is part of ‘restoring American values’Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin stood behind the Trump administration’s decision to livestream the military execution of convicted Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan, despite growing bipartisan criticism over the plan. In an interview with CBS News’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday, Mullin dismissed concerns coming from across party lines that publicizing Hasan’s…The Hill
PoliticsOct 11Face the Nation: Barrasso, Pappas, SankarMissed the second half of the show? GOP Senate Whip John Barrasso and Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas join. Plus, Palantir's Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar.CBS News
PoliticsOct 11Trump congratulates Italian-Americans on Columbus Day who "suffered" from the "radical left"The American president celebrated Columbus Day, highlighting the contribution of the Italian-American community and criticizing sectors that tore down monuments. The president updated the holiday, reinstating statues and honoring the navigator at the White House, in a gesture towards the Hispanic legacy.Clarín
DisasterOct 11Heavy rains cause flood risk in eastern USClarín
PoliticsOct 11Transcript: Sen. Chris Murphy on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 11, 2026The following is the transcript of the interview with Sen. Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Oct. 11, 2026.CBS News
WorldOct 11Injury-riddled Chargers fade late in loss to BroncosPlaying without three starting offensive linemen and several other key players, the Chargers squander a seven-point fourth-quarter lead in a 23-17 defeat, falling to 0-5 on the season.redlandsdailyfacts · united states of america
PoliticsOct 11Emmer says he’s ‘so happy’ Trump will decide whether to stream public executionHouse Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) on Sunday said he is “so happy” that President Trump will decide on whether to livestream the execution by firing squad of convicted Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan. “I am so happy that we have a president, a chief executive in this country, who will make a decision which…The Hill
WorldOct 11Ohio animal hospital owner accused of using dead dog’s name to obtain thousands of prescription pillsDr. Kris L. Taylor and Camille Angulat-Nieto received over 20 prescriptions for ‘Punkin’ a dog that was already deadThe Independent World
PoliticsOct 11Marko Kolanovic calls Trump’s energy ceasefire a ‘con,’ Tom Lee sees potential inflation reliefMarko Kolanovic has labeled a claimed "energy ceasefire" by Trump as a "con," while Tom Lee views it as a potential source of inflation relief.Seeking Alpha Tech
Sci & TechOct 11A Florida nuclear power plant draws water from the Atlantic through pipes 457 meters offshore, and sea turtles travel through them into an almost 1.6-kilometer cooling canal; biologists thus recorded three patterns to improve their conservationFor 47 years, biologists recorded the phenomenon with turtles at a US nuclear plant.Clarín
PoliticsOct 11Are Marcos’ minions in Congress plotting to amend the Constitution?THE controversy over whether the Senate can reduce the votes required to convict an impeached official from 16 to 14 raises a question far more consequential than the fate of Vice President Sara Duterte. If senators can change an explicit numerical requirement of the Constitution through their own procedural rules, what prevents Congress from similarly altering other safeguards — including, and especially, the rules for amending the Constitution itself? Article XI, Section 3(6) of the 1987 Constitution states: “No person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate.” With 24 sitting senators, that requires 16 affirmative votes. It does not say two-thirds of those present, those voting, or those who have not abstained. The phrase is “all the Members.” The proposed reduction to 14 would require excluding some senators from the denominator. Disguised as a technical adjustment, it raises a fundamental issue: Can a chamber’s procedural rules change the voting requirements categorically stipulated by the Constitution? If so, the implications extend well beyond impeachment. Numerous constitutional provisions demand specified fractions of all members precisely because certain powers should not be exercised by an ordinary political majority. [ATTACHED PHOTO NUMBER 1 HERE] CAPTION/ AI-GENERATED CARTOON UPON INSTRUCTIONS AND SUPERVISION OF MR. TIGLAO. Reducing the threshold by a mere majority vote of its members is a very dangerous precedent for tampering with the Constitution itself. The Constitution’s Article XVII, Section 1 permits Congress to propose constitutional amendments or revisions upon a vote of three-fourths of all its members. Article XVII, Section 3 separately provides for calling a constitutional convention by a two-thirds vote of all members of Congress. These provisions determine how the fundamental law may be changed. [ATTACHED TABLE HERE] If the Supreme Court does not rule unconstitutional the Senate’s majority ruling to lower the threshold for impeachment, Marcos’ minions there would claim that Congress has also the right to reduce the denominator in computing how the three-fourths, or two-thirds, are determined in calling for an amendment of the Constitution. The easy path here is for them to accept the interpretation that three-fourths of each chamber would have to vote to amend the Constitution. That would be easy in the case of the House of Representatives, since it consists of political pygmies, or easy-to-bribe politicians. Marcos may find it more difficult to get a three-fourths vote in the Senate, all of whom are elected nationally and most members think they could be president someday. So, what does he do? Do what he has managed to do in Sara’s impeachment: Jail or force to be a fugitive uncooperative senators, and get the Senate to rule that only present members of the chamber can vote whether to amend the Constitution or not. Marcos, therefore, can call for a constitutional convention with just 14 senators out of the sitting 24 senators. And as happened in the 1970 constitutional convention and 1986 Constitutional Commission, it would be easy for a president to control such bodies. Am I too suspicious to believe that Marcos would get a constitutional assembly or convention to amend the Constitution so that our system changes into a parliamentary one, which would allow him to be Prime Minister to perpetuate his rule? He is really the son of his father. The move to lower the threshold in Sara’s impeachment therefore would seem to be preparing the ground for this regime to amend the Constitution to perpetuate itself in power in 2028. I am amazed that Marcos’ minions in the Senate had the gall to lower the number of votes needed to convict Sara. Our Constitution has an internal consistency in providing for the thresholds for major Senate decisions: Treaties — Article VII, Section 21 provides that no treaty or international agreement shall be valid and effective without concurrence by at least two-thirds of all Senate members. Its wording closely parallels the impeachment clause. Treaties can impose obligations involving national security, military cooperation, territorial interests, foreign relations and economic policy. The Constitution requires more than a simple majority because treaty commitments may bind the country long after the administration that negotiated them has left office. A Senate able to adjust the denominator could declare an agreement approved that did not obtain the normally required 16 votes. Veto — Article VI, Section 27(1) requires two-thirds of all members of each chamber to override a presidential veto. The requirement embodies the separation of powers: Congress may enact a measure despite presidential objections, but only if it assembles a supermajority in both chambers. As in voting in the impeachment, this article stipulates two-thirds of all members, not of participating members. Expulsion — Article VI, Section 16(3) permits each house, with concurrence of two-thirds of all its members, to suspend or expel a member. All of its members, not members present. The supermajority is an important protection against a ruling coalition’s use of disciplinary proceedings to eliminate opponents. It is important to emphasize that Article XI, Section 3(3-4), the impeachment process, uses a different threshold for the House of Representatives: at least one-third of all its members may approve articles of impeachment or file a verified complaint or resolution under the specified procedure. In the Senate, two-thirds of members are required to convict. The Constitution deliberately makes impeachment easier to initiate than to conclude in conviction. That difference recognizes the gravity of removing an official, particularly one elected by millions of citizens — in Sara’s case, 32 million voted to make her vice president, or 62 percent of those who cast their ballots. A minority large enough to represent one-third of the House may initiate the process, but a much broader Senate consensus must be assembled to convict. Impeachment is not a parliamentary vote of no confidence, in which an incumbent falls simply because a temporary majority has turned against him or her. If the House likewise claimed the power to subtract abstaining or absent representatives from “all its Members,” it could attempt to transmit articles of impeachment with fewer affirmative votes. The protection against politically motivated proceedings would then be weakened at both ends: initiation in the House and conviction in the Senate. The Constitution’s framers were very well aware of the distinction between total membership from attendance. Article VI, Section 16(4), for example, permits one-fifth of the members present to require the “yeas” and “nays” on a question to be entered in the journal. That wording is different from “all the Members.” Such distinctions are not ornamental. They identify different constitutional denominators for different governmental actions. More importantly, the framers couldn’t have missed the fact that the US Constitution categorically says that to convict, “two-thirds of members present.” The framers of our Constitution didn’t just follow the US precedent, and stipulated only “two-thirds of all members.” The issue is ultimately whether the Constitution’s supermajorities are genuine limits on political power or numbers that legislators may adjust when inconvenient. If those entrusted to obey constitutional restraints can alter them through their own procedures, the restraints lose much of their meaning. The question is no longer merely whether 14 or 16 senators can convict Sara Duterte. It is whether the numerical safeguards of the Constitution remain safeguards at all. Facebook: Rigoberto Tiglao X: @bobitiglao Website: www.rigobertotiglao.commanilatimes · philippines
DisasterOct 114 dead as cyclone Isaias hits southern USmanilatimes · philippines
DisasterOct 11Passenger dies days after Spartanburg County crash, troopers sayOne person has died days after a Spartanburg County crash, troopers report.wyff · united states of america
DisasterOct 11Some in Florida and Alabama without power as Isaias brings rain mid-AtlanticResidents in Florida and Alabama are experiencing power outages as Tropical Storm Isaias brings rain to the mid-Atlantic region. This indicates ongoing disruptions and impacts from the storm across multiple states.timesdaily · united states of america
← NewerOlder →